[Investigations on suckling piglets castrated under automated isoflurane anesthesia]. / Untersuchungen zur automatisierten Isoflurannarkose bei der Saugferkelkastration.

OBJECTIVE: Investigation of defensive reactions, piglet losses, post-bleeding and recovery time of suckling piglets castrated under automated isoflurane anesthesia as well as measurements of isoflurane concentrations in ambient air and estimation of the cleaning and disinfection success of anesthesia masks. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 955 suckling piglets (age: 4.0 ± 1.2 days; weight: 2.0 ± 0.5 kg) were castrated under automated isoflurane anesthesia (PorcAnest 3000®) after the administration of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Reactions during the procedure were assessed before castration using the interdigital claw reflex and during castration by defensive movements and vocal response. The piglets' recovery time was evaluated in the stable corridor (pass 1) and the farrowing pen (passes 4-5). In 73 animals, the spermatic cord was cut with a scalpel and the post-operative bleeding visually evaluated. In addition, exposure measurements of isoflurane were performed and anesthetic masks were examined for total bacterial contamination and indicator bacteria before and after the anesthetic procedure and following their disinfection. RESULTS: Following insufflation of isoflurane for 90 seconds 94.3 % of the piglets and after prior testing of the interdigital claw reflex and possible extension of the anesthetic supply 95.3 % of the piglets showed no or minimal defensive movements during castration. An anesthetic incident occurred in 0.9 % of the piglets, but no animal died. The recovery time lasted 7.3 ± 4.7 minutes (pass 1) and 6.2 ± 3.3 minutes (passes 4-5). Cutting the spermatic cord with a scalpel led to a higher post-bleeding score (p < 0.001) compared to use of the emasculator. Isoflurane concentrations in ambient air ranged between 4.5 und 28.1 mg/m3. Masks disinfection reduced the total germ count by 99.8 %. Contaminations with Escherichia coli and MRSA were no longer detectable in 4 of 6 cases after disinfection. CONCLUSION: Isoflurane anesthesia led in over 94 % of the piglets to no or minimal defensive reactions during castration. Anesthetic incidents occurred rarely and no piglet losses were recorded. Therefore, automated isoflurane anesthesia is associated with a low risk for suckling piglets. Measurements of isoflurane concentrations on persons involved were below the internationally lowest limit value. Disinfection of the anesthesia masks may prevent germ transmission between animal groups via this potential vector.

[Pain and distress response of suckling piglets to injection and castration under local anaesthesia with procaine and licocaine - Part 2: Defence behaviour, catecholamines, coordination of movements]. / Schmerz- und Stressbestimmung bei der Injektion und Kastration von Saugferkeln unter Lokalanästhesie mit Procain und Lidocain.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of the effectiveness of local anaesthesia (LA) in piglet castration with the combination of scrotal and inguinal application of procaine 2 % and lidocaine 5 % to the intratesticular application of lidocaine 1 % using following parameters: adrenaline (A), noradrenaline (NA), defensive movements and coordinated movement patterns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2 substudies 232 male suckling piglets (3-6 days of age) were randomly allocated to study groups. In groups L5 and group P2 lidocaine 5 % and procaine 2 % was applied inguinally and scrotally, respectively, while piglets of groups H (handling) and K (castration without local anaesthesia) were only fixated as for an injection. In group L1 lidocaine 1 % was injected intratesticularly. After 30 min piglets were were castrated, whereas animals of group H were again only fixated. In substudy 1 (n = 112) blood samples were taken to determine the concentration of catecholamines after castration. During injection and castration defensive movements were judged. In substudy 2 (n = 120) piglets completed a chute to document the individual stress level. RESULTS: Groups H and L1 demonstrated significantly less defensive movements during fixation for injection/injection compared to the other study groups (p ≤ 0.05). After the injection piglets of group P2 had significantly more difficulties in the chute and needed > 50 % more time to complete the course. In all study groups defensive movements during castration were the highest at the moment of severing the spermal cord. Group K obtained the highest possible rating of 8 and differed significantly from the other groups as well as when cutting the skin (p ≤ 0.05). Both the concentration of A and NA significantly rose in all groups. The increase in A and NA was significantly higher in group 2, as well as the increase in NA in group K, both in comparison to the other study groups (p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: None of the applied techniques for local anaesthesia achieved a complete elimination of pain during castration of suckling piglets. The behaviour analysis indicated an altogether higher distress for P2. After castration, this injection led to a neuroendocrine pain reaction that was comparable to or higher than that of group K. In both lidocaine groups (L1, L5) the pain reaction after castration tended to be lower. These results provide approaches to apply longer acting LA with a higher analgesic potency in an appropriate dosage and with an appropriate method of application.

[Pain and distress responses of suckling piglets to injection and castration under local anaesthesia with procaine and lidocaine - Part 1: Cortisol, chromogranin A, wound healing, weights, losses]. / Schmerz- und Stressbestimmung bei der Injektion und Kastration von Saugferkeln unter Lokalanästhesie mit Procain und Lidocain.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of the effectiveness of local anaesthesia (LA) in piglet castration by procaine 2 % and lidocaine 5 % both through combined inguinal and scrotal application as well as by intratesticular application of lidocaine 1 %. The parameters used were serum cortisol and chromogranin A (CgA) concentrations as well as wound healing, body weight and animal losses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2 substudies, a total of 232 male piglets aged 3-6 days were included. Substudy 1 (112 piglets): Group H: fixation of piglets as for an injection; group L5: inguinal and scrotal injection of lidocaine 5 %; group P2: inguinal and scrotal injection of procaine 2 %; group L1: intratesticular injection of lidocaine 1 %. In all the groups, blood samples were taken 45 minutes before and 30 minutes post-injection (p. i.). Substudy 2 (120 piglets): Group H: handling only as for an injection and castration; group K: handling as for an injection and castration without LA after 30 minutes. Groups L5, P2 and L1: management as in substudy 1 and castration after 30 minutes. Blood samples were taken 75 minutes before as well as 30, 60 and 240 minutes post-castration (p. c.). The evaluated parameters were serum cortisol and CgA concentrations, wound healing, body weight and piglet losses. RESULTS: Substudy 1: The elevation of the cortisol and CgA concentrations in group P2 p. i. were significantly higher than in the other groups. The mean total cortisol concentration of group P2 p. i. was significantly higher than those of the other groups. Substudy 2: At 30 minutes p. c., all the groups displayed a significant increase in the cortisol concentration compared to group H. In group P2, the highest total cortisol concentration was measured 60 minutes p. c. and the elevation of the cortisol level was significantly higher than in the other groups. In group L1, a significantly greater increase in the CgA level was observed at 60 minutes p. c. when compared to the other groups. Regarding wound healing, body weight and losses, there were no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: The combined inguinal and scrotal injection of procaine 2 % induced a greater neuroendocrine stress response than the inguinal and scrotal injection of lidocaine 5 % and the intratesticular injection of lidocaine 1 %. LA using procaine 2 %, lidocaine 5 % or lidocaine 1 % did not completely eliminate pain during castration. Castration under LA with procaine 2 % induced a greater pain reaction than castration without LA. Both groups castrated with LA using lidocaine (L1, L5) tended to display lower pain responses after castration than group K. On the basis of the findings of this study, other local anaesthetics that have a stronger effect could be further investigated according to their pain-killing effects in an appropriate application route.